🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have harvested millions of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Boost for AI Training

Industry experts said the apparent leak could boost artificial intelligence firms looking for data to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would likely be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own private free version of the service”. He said it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has become a key issue between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.